The Nimzo-Indian Defence 2An solid aggressive and simple system against the Nimzo-Indian Defence
IntroductionStrategies inherent in the Nimzo-indian defenceThe Nimzo-indian is Aron Nimzowitsch's greatest contributory system to modern opening theory. It is one of the most popular defences to 1.d4. It often features black trying to saddle white with doubled pawns and then use the higher level Nimzowitsch strategies of Restraint and Blockade to remove White's counterplay and exploit white's structural weaknesses. Black makes the concession of giving up the dark squared bishop, hoping that the position will remain closed enough for his knights to be equal or more effective than the White bishops. White's implicit plans with consideration to having the two bishops and possible structural damage on the queenside are generally:
The Rubinstein variationStarting Position
This move which signals the start of the Rubinstein variation is the main line of the Nimzo-Indian. White leaves the bishop on c1 at home and prepares development of his kingside pieces. Rubinstein was one of the worlds best four players from about 1907 to 1922 (See Lasker in culture section). The first game of the Rubinstein variation was when Rubinstein introduced it against Alekhine in the St Petersburg tournament, 1914: Rubinstein Akiba - Alekhine Alexander [E43] Black has a number of alternatives here :- This paper looks at the following 3 alternatives and more importantly tries to focus on the ideas and concepts that they represent. It is too easy to drown in variations presented in standard "cop-out" opening books/ encyclopaedias. If you like being drowned in a sea of variations/ past games, then you can view all the games in this technical paper's appendices without trying to figure out the higher level template plans! |
|
Copyright © 1998,
1999 by Chess Corner. All rights reserved.
|